Four essential reasons to doubt the assassination attempt

Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

As we enter the era of virtual political reality, our debates are increasingly about reality. Was the Apollo space program a success? Was Al Qaeda responsible for the 9-11 attack? Is it possible that SARS-CoV-2 was man made? Were the mRNA injections safe and effective? Were all of the vaccines on the Childhood Immunization Schedule adequately tested? Does President Biden have dementia?

The unspeakable answers to all of the above are obviously true. In the public sphere reality is largely contrived. “News” delivered by corporate media is propaganda in every meaningful sense of the word. Any journalist who seriously engages with any of the above issues is summarily banned to the fringes of society as a conspiracy theorist. The law protecting open public discourse in the US - namely the First Amendment of the Constitution - is not enforced.

In this context, the “assassination attempt” of candidate Trump of July 13 must be considered critically - particularly since that mythology surrounding this event seems to only be growing. This is evident in scenes from the assassination attempt reunion yesterday. As one supporter of candidate Trump stated: “I witnessed a miracle that day. God kept him alive to save our country and make the world a better place.”

The case that the assassination attempt was staged has been made previously in this newsletter but it is presented here as a whole. The reasons to doubt the “assassination attempt” are as follows.

1. No evidence of a bullet wound.

   The supposed wound to the candidate’s ear is invisible. Period. In ordinary circumstances this fact would settle the matter. Those who choose to ignore this fact are embarrassing themselves.

2. No evidence of a bullet.

   A bullet supposedly hit the candidate’s ear or produced shrapnel that hit the candidate’s ear. Federal law enforcement has not found that bullet or has not disclosed that the bullet has been found. The video recording of the gunshot is not realistic as the gunshot sound is obviously discontinuities exist between the gunshot sounds and the ongoing sounds from voices. A photograph purportedly captured the bullet mid-flight obviously could not have produced the wound.¹ Moreover, the photograph itself is obviously not authentic.²

3. No evidence of an investigation.

   The have been few statements from federal law enforcement regarding the supposed assassination attempt. Notably there has been no ballistics report. Suspicion that the is no investigation is also due to the inability of federal law enforcement to respond a document request under the Freedom of Information Act related to the supposed assassination attempt.

4. No evidence of a campaign event.

   The number of attendees at the campaign event who have provided public testimonies and evidence is in the single digits. A single phone video of actual shooting is available on social media.

In summary, there are compelling reasons to doubt the reality of the assassination attempt. Denial of these facts must now be considered a form of provoked collective psychosis.

1. Comparison of the video with the photograph shows that the candidate was already reacting to the wound at the time the bullet photograph was taken.

2. The length of the streak from the bullet is disproportionately long given the disclosed exposure time of 1/8000 second and the expected velocity from an AR-15 bullet of less than 3200 feet per second. In particular, the bullet in the photograph must have passed near to the candidate since it is in focus.