Point 2. The federal investigation of the crime scene was criminally incompetent or purposely inadequate, most likely, IMHO because the weaponized federal government was complicit in the assassination attempt, horrible as that is to contemplate. At least one of Crooks’ encrypted phones has been pinged in the vicinity of the FBI building in DC, IIRC in the time period preceding the rally/assassination attempt—WTH was Crooks doing there? It is already well established from Trump’s first term that the FBI (& other alphabet soup agencies) have been compromised and corrupted against President Trump. The roof of the AGR building was hosed off within hours of the shooting, with a less than thorough inspection of the crime scene.
No bullet was found because nobody was seriously looking for one (as the bullet found might not have matched Crooks weapon (OMG! how would they explain that?? Even the Warren Commission couldn’t have explained that away— plus there is video evidence of what appears to be a muzzle flash coming from an open window in the AGR building below where Crooks was).
What is not quite logical to me is why people believe that the consummate insider - Donald Trump - is somehow going to take on the system. In any case, the evidence from the “assassination attempt” is dispositive - fake bullet photograph - fake gunshot sounds.
3. There are (or were shortly after the assassination attempt) multiple phone videos, not to mention media videos that I reviewed repeatedly at the time. Furthermore there were multiple recreations, analyses of the gunshots sounds that were done & presented here on SubStack in days following. There was a small army of amateur detectives with substantial skill sets involved in analyzing the attempt.
Your essay appears to be equivalent to 9/11denialism. As Ilian Omar said ‘some people did something on that day.
Point 1. Asserting facts not in evidence. Sir, have you interviewed the Secret Service personnel who were failing to effectively protect President Trump, the ambulance attendants, the ER staff or attending physician(s)? No. Have you reviewed the medical records of the ambulance ride and the ER encounter? No. So you are either confabulating or, more likely, lying.
JFK was real assassinated & it wasn’t who Warren et al said it was, it was the same schmucks who offed RFK, and possibly MLK & Malcom X. They seem to be still in business, though less competent these days.
I have never seen the Oliver Stone movie & I am unconvinced by your derivative fantasy.
At 13 years old, I was not personally emotionally impacted by the assassination: I had bigger worries: I had a part in a school play that night and I hadn’t learned my lines. As the play was canceled, I was probably the only person in the world who was happy that JFK was assassinated (lol, but true).
So you admit to not even seeing JFK X but you know all about it. With experts like you around, who needs to think! Is that why you took the vaccine too? Cause you didn't look and were clueless? Maybe there's a trend here?!?!
Cryptic post followed by a query on the order of , ‘Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of last night’s play?’
Because you bastards tried to assassinate a former and now likely future president. Whether a member of the Democrat party or just a supporter you by your denial of the facts of the attempt are complicit, an accessory after the fact, as it were. And in my mind, blood on your hands.
Your ilk have been after him since he rode down the escalator in 2016.
Not you personally, but the ‘leadership’ that you follow, if you can call it that—lmao back at you, though I guess in a way you could say that Al Capone was a leader of sorts.
For you to assert that routine vaccines have been adequately tested, that the COVID Bioweapons countermeasures falsely sold as vaccines are both safe and effective undermines your credibility. But your false assertions are to be expected, given that your career depends upon you believing those falsehoods (as I can tell from your brief bio blurb). (It has been observed that it is very difficult to convince anyone that a proposition is false, if their livelihoods depended upon them believing it is true.)
I used to believe that childhood vaccines were safe, necessary and effective. At most I believe 1out of 3 since educating myself in the aftermath of the COVID Plandemic.
I initially drank the kool aide regarding the COVID jabs, and took 2 Moderna & a booster, but as people pointed out the high incidence & prevalence of adverse events with the jabs and the transitory effectiveness and more recently evidence for negative efficacy of the clot shots, as well as the increased all cause mortality demonstrated in every country with substantial penetration of COVID ‘vaccines’, I have come to be convinced that no nor should take the jabs & they should be withdrawn and no further MmRNA based vaccines be developed or approved.( Note that I am avoiding calling them true vaccines, as the CDC/FDA changed the definition of vaccine just for them, a sure tell, just as changing primary endpoints is a violation of research ethics, or at least it used to be until Pfizer, Fauci, et al corrupted the whole biomedical research industry for fun, profit, and to politically damage POTUS DJT).
On the basis of those two false assertions and your occupation (government researcher), I conclude that you are very likely a Democrat and hence massively biased against Trump, and any analysis of yours would be massively tainted by your bias, and not trustworthy (about as trustworthy as a Hillary Rodham Clinton assertion of innocence).
Roger has written some of the most inane things on your thread. You can tell how partisanship thinking destroys one's critical mind. All vaccines are scams, enough of that bamboozle.
I'm still laughing about the picture of the bullet. Anybody who has some knowledge about photography/filmography knows this picture just can't exist.
Nothin but a squib. Check out JFK X (I did a review on the movie). Trump's not the first on to do this.
Point 2. The federal investigation of the crime scene was criminally incompetent or purposely inadequate, most likely, IMHO because the weaponized federal government was complicit in the assassination attempt, horrible as that is to contemplate. At least one of Crooks’ encrypted phones has been pinged in the vicinity of the FBI building in DC, IIRC in the time period preceding the rally/assassination attempt—WTH was Crooks doing there? It is already well established from Trump’s first term that the FBI (& other alphabet soup agencies) have been compromised and corrupted against President Trump. The roof of the AGR building was hosed off within hours of the shooting, with a less than thorough inspection of the crime scene.
No bullet was found because nobody was seriously looking for one (as the bullet found might not have matched Crooks weapon (OMG! how would they explain that?? Even the Warren Commission couldn’t have explained that away— plus there is video evidence of what appears to be a muzzle flash coming from an open window in the AGR building below where Crooks was).
What is not quite logical to me is why people believe that the consummate insider - Donald Trump - is somehow going to take on the system. In any case, the evidence from the “assassination attempt” is dispositive - fake bullet photograph - fake gunshot sounds.
3. There are (or were shortly after the assassination attempt) multiple phone videos, not to mention media videos that I reviewed repeatedly at the time. Furthermore there were multiple recreations, analyses of the gunshots sounds that were done & presented here on SubStack in days following. There was a small army of amateur detectives with substantial skill sets involved in analyzing the attempt.
Your essay appears to be equivalent to 9/11denialism. As Ilian Omar said ‘some people did something on that day.
Having briefly skimmed your brief essay/short story/brief work of fiction, I call bull shit.
Point 1. Asserting facts not in evidence. Sir, have you interviewed the Secret Service personnel who were failing to effectively protect President Trump, the ambulance attendants, the ER staff or attending physician(s)? No. Have you reviewed the medical records of the ambulance ride and the ER encounter? No. So you are either confabulating or, more likely, lying.
Lots of Controlled Op loose ends for you to go down, that's how they make them happen. Why are your panties in a knot over this?
JFK was real assassinated & it wasn’t who Warren et al said it was, it was the same schmucks who offed RFK, and possibly MLK & Malcom X. They seem to be still in business, though less competent these days.
Roger Kimber MD,
You really should take a look at the MANY FAKE DEATHS analysed at mileswmathis.com. Everyone on your list and beau coup to boot.
Don’t have time tonight, bed time;?thanks
I have never seen the Oliver Stone movie & I am unconvinced by your derivative fantasy.
At 13 years old, I was not personally emotionally impacted by the assassination: I had bigger worries: I had a part in a school play that night and I hadn’t learned my lines. As the play was canceled, I was probably the only person in the world who was happy that JFK was assassinated (lol, but true).
So you admit to not even seeing JFK X but you know all about it. With experts like you around, who needs to think! Is that why you took the vaccine too? Cause you didn't look and were clueless? Maybe there's a trend here?!?!
Movies are entertainment, & from the reviews that I just read, and it seems unlikely to be true, nor good entertainment. The
I watched a movie on the way home from Africa earlier this month: Ford vs Ferrari Ford won.
Cryptic post followed by a query on the order of , ‘Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of last night’s play?’
Because you bastards tried to assassinate a former and now likely future president. Whether a member of the Democrat party or just a supporter you by your denial of the facts of the attempt are complicit, an accessory after the fact, as it were. And in my mind, blood on your hands.
Your ilk have been after him since he rode down the escalator in 2016.
lmao, you are now accusing us of being assassins. Why don't you take a break from your mental troubles and watch a movie?
https://jeromearmstrong.substack.com/p/fake-jfk-x-movie-kennedy-squib-assassination
Oh, & I don’t believe your fantasy either.
Normies gotta norm!
Not you personally, but the ‘leadership’ that you follow, if you can call it that—lmao back at you, though I guess in a way you could say that Al Capone was a leader of sorts.
For you to assert that routine vaccines have been adequately tested, that the COVID Bioweapons countermeasures falsely sold as vaccines are both safe and effective undermines your credibility. But your false assertions are to be expected, given that your career depends upon you believing those falsehoods (as I can tell from your brief bio blurb). (It has been observed that it is very difficult to convince anyone that a proposition is false, if their livelihoods depended upon them believing it is true.)
I used to believe that childhood vaccines were safe, necessary and effective. At most I believe 1out of 3 since educating myself in the aftermath of the COVID Plandemic.
I initially drank the kool aide regarding the COVID jabs, and took 2 Moderna & a booster, but as people pointed out the high incidence & prevalence of adverse events with the jabs and the transitory effectiveness and more recently evidence for negative efficacy of the clot shots, as well as the increased all cause mortality demonstrated in every country with substantial penetration of COVID ‘vaccines’, I have come to be convinced that no nor should take the jabs & they should be withdrawn and no further MmRNA based vaccines be developed or approved.( Note that I am avoiding calling them true vaccines, as the CDC/FDA changed the definition of vaccine just for them, a sure tell, just as changing primary endpoints is a violation of research ethics, or at least it used to be until Pfizer, Fauci, et al corrupted the whole biomedical research industry for fun, profit, and to politically damage POTUS DJT).
On the basis of those two false assertions and your occupation (government researcher), I conclude that you are very likely a Democrat and hence massively biased against Trump, and any analysis of yours would be massively tainted by your bias, and not trustworthy (about as trustworthy as a Hillary Rodham Clinton assertion of innocence).
My view on COVID vaccination is that it is fraud - and probably most if not all of the assorted other vaccinations.
Roger has written some of the most inane things on your thread. You can tell how partisanship thinking destroys one's critical mind. All vaccines are scams, enough of that bamboozle.